LogoLogo
- BACK TO THE GFMD WEBSITE+ SUBSCRIBE TO THE GFMD IMPACT NEWSLETTER
  • Welcome to GFMD IMPACT
  • Learning meetings
    • 2025
      • From crisis to opportunity: reimagining media development in the MENA region (Apr. 2025)
        • Meeting Agenda
        • Literature Review
          • Lebanon
          • Palestine
          • Syria
          • MENA region
          • Frameworks, Guidelines and Recommendations
      • Connecting the dots: How to use existing mechanisms to protect media freedom online? (Jan. 2025)
    • 2024
      • GFMD Levant Regional Meeting on Media Support (Dec. 2024)
        • Mapping report
        • Key Recommendations
        • Meeting Agenda
        • Literature Review
          • Lebanon
          • Palestine
          • Syria
          • MENA region
          • Frameworks, Guidelines and Recommendations
      • Post-Summit of the Future Updates and Upcoming Opportunities (Nov. 2024)
      • UNDP–GFMD-SFCG Webinar: Media actors and the (de)construction of the ‘other’ (Oct. 2024)
        • Key insights from the meeting
        • Speakers
        • Literature review
      • Advocating for public interest media and journalism (Aug.-Sept.2024)
        • Donor Workshop: Donor Support for Locally Led Journalism and Media Advocacy (Sept. 2024)
          • Meeting agenda
        • Learning Call: Coordinating policy and advocacy working groups (Aug.2024)
          • Meeting agenda
        • Literature review
      • GFMD Regional Meeting for the wider European region (May 2024)
        • Mapping report
        • Meeting report
        • Meeting agenda
        • Literature review
      • GFMD Latin America & Caribbean Summit (May 2024)
        • Meeting report
        • Literature Review & Case Studies
      • Journalism Cloud Alliance Inaugural Meeting (Apr. 2024)
        • Meeting agenda
        • Speakers
        • Literature Review
        • Press release
      • PRIMED (Feb. - Mar. 2024)
        • Key takeaways
        • Workshop 1
          • Meeting agenda
          • Speakers
          • Literature review & case studies
        • Workshop 2
          • Meeting agenda
          • Speakers
          • Literature review & case studies
        • Workshop 3
          • Meeting agenda
          • Literature review & case studies
    • 2023
      • MENA regional meeting (Nov. 2023)
        • Lit review & case studies
        • Meeting report
      • National Journalism Funds (July 2023)
        • Lit' review & case studies
      • Philanthropy for Ukraine (Apr. '23)
      • Summit for Democracy (March. '23)
        • Media Freedom Cohort: key outcomes and findings
        • Thriving media for resilient democracies
        • Media viability in crisis
        • Other Summit for Democracy Events
      • National consultations on Media Viability (Jan.- Feb. '23)
        • Lebanon
        • Tunisia
        • Namibia
    • 2022
      • Challenges and perspectives for media support programs (Nov. '22)
      • World News Media Congress: Media Viability (Sept. '22)
        • Meeting Report
      • Investing in the future of independent journalism (Sept. '22)
        • Investing in independent media to strengthen democracy
        • Exploring new funding models: thinking brave and bold
        • Editorial sustainability: on ownership and media capture
        • Investing in people
        • Agenda
      • IAMCR 2022 (July '22)
      • World Press Freedom Day (Uruguay, May '22)
        • Principles for effective media assistance
        • Safety of journalists in Ukraine
      • Principles for effective mediadev Belgrade (April '22)
        • Coordination and local perspective
        • Suggestions for improving the support
        • Building digital competences
        • Positive examples
      • MFC Global Conference for Media Freedom (9 Feb. '22)
        • Sustainability & viability
          • How is sustainability defined and measured?
          • Cross-cutting themes
          • Achieving sustainability and viability
          • Initiatives to support media sustainability: an overview for donors and policy
          • Literature review
          • Meeting agenda
        • Renewing the principles for effective media support
          • Process of renewing the principles, development and pathways to implementation
          • Three pillars identified in the consultative process so far
          • Donor perspective- improved partnership
          • Improvements that would benefit the principles process
          • Moving forward with the Principles for Effective Media Development
        • Participation in other MFC events
      • Principles for effective mediadev (Jan. '22)
    • 2021
      • Theories of change & impact measurement (March '21)
        • Meeting agenda
        • Case studies
          • Theories of change in media and governance programmes
          • PRIMED - Protecting Independent Media for Effective Development
          • Measuring the impact of investigative reporting
        • Introduction to GFMD IMPACT
        • Feedback
      • Disinformation - Media support (June '21)
        • Introduction (efficacy of MediaDev responses)
        • 1. Identification responses
        • 2. Responses aimed at producers and distributors
        • 3. Impacting production and distribution mechanisms
        • 4. Supporting the target audiences of disinformation campaigns
        • 5. Evaluating counter-disinformation programmes
          • The Challenges of Evaluating Countering Disinformation Programs: A Working Paper (June 2021)
          • Tips for evaluators
        • 6. Research on disinformation
        • Literature review
        • Feedback
        • Meeting agenda
      • Principles for effective mediadev (Dec. '21)
        • In quotes - What should the principles look like?
        • Feedback
  • Resource centre
  • Activities & services
    • OECD Development Co-operation Principles for Relevant and Effective Support to Media and the Information Environment
    • Help desk
      • Report: Informing the Initial Priorities of IFPIM
      • Literature review on pooled funds
        • IFPIM
    • Learning meetings
  • Policy & Learning Meetings
    • Workshop on Encryption and Media Freedom (June '23)
      • Workshop Report
      • Resources
    • Gender Equality in Media Regulation (May '22)
      • Meeting Report
      • Literature Review
  • RESOURCES
    • Latest data, trends and issues facing journalism and media
    • Guides for donors & funders
    • Declarations
      • Events w/recommendations
    • Policy briefs, working papers & primers
      • Disinformation
      • Gender Equality
      • MediaDev effectiveness
      • Sustainability & viability
      • ... by donors & funders
      • + how to produce a policy brief
    • Academic studies & papers
      • AI, regulation, legislation & design of platforms
      • Disinformation
        • Support to journalism
        • Media & information literacy and fact-checking
      • Ethics & independence
      • Evaluation
      • Gender Equality
      • Investigative journalism
        • Collaborative journalism
      • Journalism, democracy & governance
      • Journalism training
      • MediaDev effectiveness
      • Sustainability & viability
      • Thematic reporting
    • Research & reports
      • AI, regulation, legislation & design of platforms
      • Disinformation
        • Support to journalism
        • Media & information literacy and fact-checking
      • Ethics & independence
      • Evaluation
      • Exiled media
      • Gender Equality in Media Development
      • Investigative journalism
      • Investment & innovation
      • Journalism, democracy & governance
      • Journalism training
      • MediaDev effectiveness
      • Media in fragile contexts
      • Sustainability & viability
        • Business models & start-ups
        • Support for Ukranian Media
      • Thematic reporting
    • Case studies
      • Disinformation
      • Gender Equality
      • Impact measurement, evaluation & learning
        • PRIMED learning questions
        • Measuring social impact
      • Investigative journalism
      • Investment & innovation
      • Research Programmes
      • Sustainability & viability
    • Articles
      • AI, regulation, legislation & design of platforms
      • Data & indicators
      • Ethics & independence
      • Disinformation
        • Support to journalism
        • Media & information literacy and fact-checking
        • Gendered disinformation
      • Gender Equality
      • Investigative journalism
      • Journalism, democracy & governance
      • MediaDev effectiveness
      • Media in fragile contexts
      • Sustainability & viability
        • Business models and start-ups
        • Support for Ukrainian Media
      • Thematic reporting
    • Podcasts
      • Sustainability & viability
    • Evaluation & impact reports
      • Disinformation
      • Emergency & crisis funding
      • Media & information literacy
    • Indicators
    • Data sources
    • Learning tools, interactive maps and applications
    • Glossary
    • Independent Media in Exile
  • OPPORTUNITIES
    • Calls for papers & submissions
    • Events
  • GFMD IMPACT BACKGROUND
    • Consultation (2019)
      • Recipient Perceptions of Media Development Assistance: A GFMD Study (Jan. 2019)
      • Donor feedback on GFMD’s concept for a media development policy Hub - (Sept. 2019)
    • Co-design (2020-2021)
    • Related projects and initiatives
      • Ariadne
      • BBC Media Action research and insight
      • CAMECO
      • CIMA
        • CIMA - Putting Research to Work: Scholars and Practitioners Discuss Greater Collaboration (2016)
      • Civitates
      • Communication Initiative
      • Council of Foundations
      • Dafne
      • Forum Media and Development - FoME (Germany)
      • Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation
      • Human Rights Funders Network
      • Humanitarian Journalism
      • Journalism Funders Forum
      • Media Impact Funders
      • Media Impact Project
      • Network for European Foundations (NEF)
      • OECD - DAC Network on Governance (GovNet)
      • Government agencies
  • SUBSCRIBE TO:
    • MediaDev Insider (GFMD IMPACT's newsletter)
    • GFMD's LinkedIn newsletter
  • ABOUT
    • About GFMD IMPACT & FAQs
    • Give feedback
    • GFMD IMPACT regional coordinators
    • GFMD IMPACT pool of consultants
    • About GFMD
    • GFMD coordination
    • GFMD homepage
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Background
  • Protecting journalists with encryption
  • Defining encryption, how it works and its threats
  • Legislative threats to encryption
  • Promoting and protecting encryption: action points

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Policy & Learning Meetings
  2. Workshop on Encryption and Media Freedom (June '23)

Workshop Report

PreviousWorkshop on Encryption and Media Freedom (June '23)NextResources

Last updated 3 months ago

Was this helpful?

Background

In light of the 2023 Rightscon conference in Costa Rica, GFMD hosted the “Securing Journalism: the importance of Encryption in protecting media freedom” workshop to discuss how Encryption can prevent the growing threats of digital surveillance on journalists and their sources. Participants primarily included non-governmental organisations from the MENA region, Europe Central America and Asia.

The workshop was structured around the following questions

  • What is Encryption? Why is Encryption important for journalists?

  • What action is needed to protect and promote the use of encryption? (break-out rooms). - What is your experience in using such tools? Challenges? Stories? Changes in their work? Benefits?

  • Why is encryption important for journalists?

The five pillars of assurance (confidentiality, integrity, availability, authentication, non-repudiation) regularly came up whereby encryption addresses confidentiality issues - providing greater digital security to journalists. However, participants and speakers emphasised the threats and limitations such as unprotected metadata, compromised or seized mobiles from police or governments or unstable internet connection hindering encryption’s usage varying to countries and regions.

The participants identified challenges and offered regional perspectives and solutions on using encryption, such as greater awareness, adapting encryption to journalists’ IT skills, media organisations standardising encryption, rebooting phones and deleting messages daily to increase journalists’ safety from spyware and infiltration.

Protecting journalists with encryption

In response to what journalists do and what digital threats journalists face, participants expressed how journalists investigate, hold power to account, protect democracy and protect their sources - faced with growing digital threats such as doxxing, digital surveillance, censorship, hacking and harassment.

Wordcloud generated with Mentimeter with participant's responses to the question "What do journalists do?"

Journalists have growingly faced digital threats and challenges in protecting their sources, communicating safely, working free from surveillance while navigating local press restrictions. In addition to journalists, Callum Voge expressed the importance of encryption for minority group organisations such as the LGBTQI+ community, women’s health advocates, human rights advocates and survivors of abuse organisations. In accordance with participants’ contribution, Rawan Damen and Geoff Hunter expressed the need to consider encryption and journalists’ security holistically.

“We believe in physical, digital, legal, mental, emotional, and career safety” - Rawan Damen, Arab Reporters for Investigative Journalism.

The Director General of Arab Reporters for Investigative Journalism, shared examples of obstacles and regional limitations to using encryption: such as the Egyptian police force limiting movements of individuals having Signal on their mobile phones or Sudan lacking stable internet and electricity infrastructures to use these services, emphasising the need to consider local solution for local problems. Although journalists are encouraged to utilise encrypted apps such as Signal, IT specialist Alan Kawamara raised growing concerns about the Telegram app and data transit between users - considering the platform is not entirely encrypted.

Defining encryption, how it works and its threats

The Chief Technology Officer, Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, Geoff Hunter, defined encryption as “the process of encoding information” including messages, emails or phone calls. More specifically, the process includes encoding the original information in a ciphertext which is presented in an encrypted format to the designated recipient who holds the key to encrypt the data. Geoff Hunter explains the 2 types of encryption

  • Symmetric encryption: The sender and receiver withhold the same key, or password, to encrypt and decrypt the data. This method presents threats as those who withhold the key/password can access and control the data.

  • Asymmetric (public key) encryption: This method consists of having a private key (to decrypt data) and public key (to encrypt data) to protect it from unauthorised access.

Geoff Hunter explained how encryption is a mathematical process, using algorithms which are increasingly being challenged by the growth of computational power, aiming at cracking encryption.

“It's a bit of an arms race, like a lot of information security, or other security for software, there are new ways of using the latest computer computational power to crack encryption” - Geoff Hunter, Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP)

During the workshop, participants also had the opportunity to discuss the following questions in breakout rooms to share their experience with encryption and the existing benefits and challenges.

  • What is your experience in using such tools?

    • Challenges? Stories? Changes in their work? Benefits?

  • Why is encryption important for journalists?

Their contribution underscored several challenges, including a lack of awareness of encryption and its use, concerns regarding surveillance, and metadata leaking. Although dangers remain, Geoff Hunter provided practical methods to reduce device threats, such as rebooting mobile phones daily, keeping them patched, and frequently erasing messages on Signal in the case of a seized phone.

Andreea Belu elaborated on the laws hosting encryption safeguards, such as the European Media Freedom Act, fearing the legalisation of spyware and its usage against journalists - encouraging the digital rights and media and journalism organisations to advocate for encryption rights for journalists.

Legislative threats to encryption

Callum's recommended solutions address the alarming developments of criminalising encryption and endangering the safety of journalists and minority communities around the world.

Promoting and protecting encryption: action points

  • Reporting on the topic enables growing awareness of encryption’s benefits and brings the issue to the public. The importance of sharing the benefits of encryption fosters a shift from a negative to a positive narrative, says Rawan Damen.

  • Seeking technical sources to understand better government or legislative proposals is essential to ensure accurate comprehension - “please do not take government claims at face value”, says Callum Voge. As such, among the 110+ local chapters, the Global Coalition on Encryption may have relevant regional information.

This workshop promoted knowledge sharing and community building around issues such as digital surveillance and criminalised encryption, which would not have been possible without the speakers' and participants' involvement and contribution.

Wordcloud generated with Mentimeter with participant's responses to the question "What threats do journalists face in the digital environment?"

In collaboration with, GFMD has produced a comprehensive describing the relevance of encryption, how it works, available toolkits for journalists and why it is crucial for media protection.

To tackle the lack of awareness, Callum Voge proposed standardising encryption technologies used by media organisations, increasing training for editors in Chief and decision-makers, and encouraging using Signal in countries such as Tunisia to combat cybercrime legislation and disinformation. ’s contribution addresses language barriers by offering and in Spanish to accommodate non-English speakers. For Andreea Belu, the legislative and political narratives constitute growing threats towards encryption and journalists’ safety.

Andreea explained the European Digital Rights organisation’s (EDRi) efforts against the suggested methods of the United States Child Sexual Abuse Regulation - despite rightfully combating such a horrific crime, using client-side scanning undermines encryption. Gender and reproductive organisations, human rights defenders and investigative journalists have spoken up against this law, resulting in over 130 NGOs and EDRi’s campaign against the Child Sexual Abuse Regulation.

Andreea mentioned the ongoingcriminalising encryption and the worrying “Brussels effect” whereby passed laws influence other European countries to replicate similar approaches, implementing ill solutions and ultimately - undermining human rights globally. Callum Voge’s intervention shedded light on the worrying legislative developments and the role of legislators in the United Kingdom with the and the in the United States.

Joint advocacy, such as the , analyses proposals, provides recommendations and applies pressure on Governments to influence policy outcomes - all efficient methods, according to Callum Voge.

the Internet Society
infographic
SembraMedia
reports
resource tools
Stop Scanning Me
trial in France
Online Safety Bill
EARN IT Act
Global Encryption Coalition