LogoLogo
- BACK TO THE GFMD WEBSITE+ SUBSCRIBE TO THE GFMD IMPACT NEWSLETTER
  • Welcome to GFMD IMPACT
  • Learning meetings
    • 2025
      • From crisis to opportunity: reimagining media development in the MENA region (Apr. 2025)
        • Meeting Agenda
        • Literature Review
          • Lebanon
          • Palestine
          • Syria
          • MENA region
          • Frameworks, Guidelines and Recommendations
      • Connecting the dots: How to use existing mechanisms to protect media freedom online? (Jan. 2025)
    • 2024
      • GFMD Levant Regional Meeting on Media Support (Dec. 2024)
        • Mapping report
        • Key Recommendations
        • Meeting Agenda
        • Literature Review
          • Lebanon
          • Palestine
          • Syria
          • MENA region
          • Frameworks, Guidelines and Recommendations
      • Post-Summit of the Future Updates and Upcoming Opportunities (Nov. 2024)
      • UNDP–GFMD-SFCG Webinar: Media actors and the (de)construction of the ‘other’ (Oct. 2024)
        • Key insights from the meeting
        • Speakers
        • Literature review
      • Advocating for public interest media and journalism (Aug.-Sept.2024)
        • Donor Workshop: Donor Support for Locally Led Journalism and Media Advocacy (Sept. 2024)
          • Meeting agenda
        • Learning Call: Coordinating policy and advocacy working groups (Aug.2024)
          • Meeting agenda
        • Literature review
      • GFMD Regional Meeting for the wider European region (May 2024)
        • Mapping report
        • Meeting report
        • Meeting agenda
        • Literature review
      • GFMD Latin America & Caribbean Summit (May 2024)
        • Meeting report
        • Literature Review & Case Studies
      • Journalism Cloud Alliance Inaugural Meeting (Apr. 2024)
        • Meeting agenda
        • Speakers
        • Literature Review
        • Press release
      • PRIMED (Feb. - Mar. 2024)
        • Key takeaways
        • Workshop 1
          • Meeting agenda
          • Speakers
          • Literature review & case studies
        • Workshop 2
          • Meeting agenda
          • Speakers
          • Literature review & case studies
        • Workshop 3
          • Meeting agenda
          • Literature review & case studies
    • 2023
      • MENA regional meeting (Nov. 2023)
        • Lit review & case studies
        • Meeting report
      • National Journalism Funds (July 2023)
        • Lit' review & case studies
      • Philanthropy for Ukraine (Apr. '23)
      • Summit for Democracy (March. '23)
        • Media Freedom Cohort: key outcomes and findings
        • Thriving media for resilient democracies
        • Media viability in crisis
        • Other Summit for Democracy Events
      • National consultations on Media Viability (Jan.- Feb. '23)
        • Lebanon
        • Tunisia
        • Namibia
    • 2022
      • Challenges and perspectives for media support programs (Nov. '22)
      • World News Media Congress: Media Viability (Sept. '22)
        • Meeting Report
      • Investing in the future of independent journalism (Sept. '22)
        • Investing in independent media to strengthen democracy
        • Exploring new funding models: thinking brave and bold
        • Editorial sustainability: on ownership and media capture
        • Investing in people
        • Agenda
      • IAMCR 2022 (July '22)
      • World Press Freedom Day (Uruguay, May '22)
        • Principles for effective media assistance
        • Safety of journalists in Ukraine
      • Principles for effective mediadev Belgrade (April '22)
        • Coordination and local perspective
        • Suggestions for improving the support
        • Building digital competences
        • Positive examples
      • MFC Global Conference for Media Freedom (9 Feb. '22)
        • Sustainability & viability
          • How is sustainability defined and measured?
          • Cross-cutting themes
          • Achieving sustainability and viability
          • Initiatives to support media sustainability: an overview for donors and policy
          • Literature review
          • Meeting agenda
        • Renewing the principles for effective media support
          • Process of renewing the principles, development and pathways to implementation
          • Three pillars identified in the consultative process so far
          • Donor perspective- improved partnership
          • Improvements that would benefit the principles process
          • Moving forward with the Principles for Effective Media Development
        • Participation in other MFC events
      • Principles for effective mediadev (Jan. '22)
    • 2021
      • Theories of change & impact measurement (March '21)
        • Meeting agenda
        • Case studies
          • Theories of change in media and governance programmes
          • PRIMED - Protecting Independent Media for Effective Development
          • Measuring the impact of investigative reporting
        • Introduction to GFMD IMPACT
        • Feedback
      • Disinformation - Media support (June '21)
        • Introduction (efficacy of MediaDev responses)
        • 1. Identification responses
        • 2. Responses aimed at producers and distributors
        • 3. Impacting production and distribution mechanisms
        • 4. Supporting the target audiences of disinformation campaigns
        • 5. Evaluating counter-disinformation programmes
          • The Challenges of Evaluating Countering Disinformation Programs: A Working Paper (June 2021)
          • Tips for evaluators
        • 6. Research on disinformation
        • Literature review
        • Feedback
        • Meeting agenda
      • Principles for effective mediadev (Dec. '21)
        • In quotes - What should the principles look like?
        • Feedback
  • Resource centre
  • Activities & services
    • OECD Development Co-operation Principles for Relevant and Effective Support to Media and the Information Environment
    • Help desk
      • Report: Informing the Initial Priorities of IFPIM
      • Literature review on pooled funds
        • IFPIM
    • Learning meetings
  • Policy & Learning Meetings
    • Workshop on Encryption and Media Freedom (June '23)
      • Workshop Report
      • Resources
    • Gender Equality in Media Regulation (May '22)
      • Meeting Report
      • Literature Review
  • RESOURCES
    • Latest data, trends and issues facing journalism and media
    • Guides for donors & funders
    • Declarations
      • Events w/recommendations
    • Policy briefs, working papers & primers
      • Disinformation
      • Gender Equality
      • MediaDev effectiveness
      • Sustainability & viability
      • ... by donors & funders
      • + how to produce a policy brief
    • Academic studies & papers
      • AI, regulation, legislation & design of platforms
      • Disinformation
        • Support to journalism
        • Media & information literacy and fact-checking
      • Ethics & independence
      • Evaluation
      • Gender Equality
      • Investigative journalism
        • Collaborative journalism
      • Journalism, democracy & governance
      • Journalism training
      • MediaDev effectiveness
      • Sustainability & viability
      • Thematic reporting
    • Research & reports
      • AI, regulation, legislation & design of platforms
      • Disinformation
        • Support to journalism
        • Media & information literacy and fact-checking
      • Ethics & independence
      • Evaluation
      • Exiled media
      • Gender Equality in Media Development
      • Investigative journalism
      • Investment & innovation
      • Journalism, democracy & governance
      • Journalism training
      • MediaDev effectiveness
      • Media in fragile contexts
      • Sustainability & viability
        • Business models & start-ups
        • Support for Ukranian Media
      • Thematic reporting
    • Case studies
      • Disinformation
      • Gender Equality
      • Impact measurement, evaluation & learning
        • PRIMED learning questions
        • Measuring social impact
      • Investigative journalism
      • Investment & innovation
      • Research Programmes
      • Sustainability & viability
    • Articles
      • AI, regulation, legislation & design of platforms
      • Data & indicators
      • Ethics & independence
      • Disinformation
        • Support to journalism
        • Media & information literacy and fact-checking
        • Gendered disinformation
      • Gender Equality
      • Investigative journalism
      • Journalism, democracy & governance
      • MediaDev effectiveness
      • Media in fragile contexts
      • Sustainability & viability
        • Business models and start-ups
        • Support for Ukrainian Media
      • Thematic reporting
    • Podcasts
      • Sustainability & viability
    • Evaluation & impact reports
      • Disinformation
      • Emergency & crisis funding
      • Media & information literacy
    • Indicators
    • Data sources
    • Learning tools, interactive maps and applications
    • Glossary
    • Independent Media in Exile
  • OPPORTUNITIES
    • Calls for papers & submissions
    • Events
  • GFMD IMPACT BACKGROUND
    • Consultation (2019)
      • Recipient Perceptions of Media Development Assistance: A GFMD Study (Jan. 2019)
      • Donor feedback on GFMD’s concept for a media development policy Hub - (Sept. 2019)
    • Co-design (2020-2021)
    • Related projects and initiatives
      • Ariadne
      • BBC Media Action research and insight
      • CAMECO
      • CIMA
        • CIMA - Putting Research to Work: Scholars and Practitioners Discuss Greater Collaboration (2016)
      • Civitates
      • Communication Initiative
      • Council of Foundations
      • Dafne
      • Forum Media and Development - FoME (Germany)
      • Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation
      • Human Rights Funders Network
      • Humanitarian Journalism
      • Journalism Funders Forum
      • Media Impact Funders
      • Media Impact Project
      • Network for European Foundations (NEF)
      • OECD - DAC Network on Governance (GovNet)
      • Government agencies
  • SUBSCRIBE TO:
    • MediaDev Insider (GFMD IMPACT's newsletter)
    • GFMD's LinkedIn newsletter
  • ABOUT
    • About GFMD IMPACT & FAQs
    • Give feedback
    • GFMD IMPACT regional coordinators
    • GFMD IMPACT pool of consultants
    • About GFMD
    • GFMD coordination
    • GFMD homepage
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Effectiveness of media development responses
  • An academic perspective
  • A donor perspective
  • A practitioner perspective
  • Coordination and coalition building
  • Emphasising “Doing no harm” over being "effective"
  • Reframing the discussion on disinformation to focus resources on support for journalism
  • How to make the case for journalism support

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Learning meetings
  2. 2021
  3. Disinformation - Media support (June '21)

Introduction (efficacy of MediaDev responses)

PreviousDisinformation - Media support (June '21)Next1. Identification responses

Last updated 3 years ago

Was this helpful?

“For the whole endeavour of this growing field of disinformation, research and practice, we need more , more evidence, more , more diagnostics, more monitoring and frameworks.” (Donor)

Effectiveness of media development responses

An academic perspective

“How can we better design media development programmes to keep pace with the times? Media are really in the hot seat for why there is so much information pollution. Why isn't the media more effective as a tool of countering disinformation? That's a bigger conversation that we should have.” (Academic)

A donor perspective

Government aid agencies have to approach this issue with a certain level of humility. Collaboration, knowledge sharing and nurturing of the evidence of how and when disinformation responses are effective is essential.

“We haven't cracked the code on how to do this. [...] It's a pretty wide-open space. We don't have any Bible to turn to, there is no long track record of practice, no extensive evidence base, a lot of that evidence and work has only been generated in the last couple of years.”

“I live with a lot of uncertainty about what we do or what we're funding and whether or not it works. Because of donor implementer dynamics, it's not always possible to have spaces like this, to be frank, and honest with each other about failure or negligible impact of the different kinds of interventions that people are doing.” (Donor)

Other donor representatives expressed confidence in supporting fact-checking, investigative journalism, and media literacy as a way to support governance goals. They did, however, want more evidence about how effective it was and how such interventions could be improved.

“Are they effectively changing the norms around our consumption of disinformation? Or are they blunting the impact of disinformation?” (Donor)

A practitioner perspective

There was broad consensus that media development responses to disinformation need to work with other areas of development:

“I feel that we [in media development], continue to think that we can keep doing little projects here and there and address these big divisions in our world. I really think we waste a lot of money doing that because we don't take the approach of integrating with the broader things that are going on. [...] That means funding things like dialogues at the country level on these problems, so that people hear the conversation, bringing different actors together from different sectors who actually can bring this into the public debate.” (MediaDev practitioner/researcher)

Some examples were shared where media play a convening role to bring communities together to discuss issues around trust, truth and misinformation. These will be added to the :

Coordination and coalition building

Problem: Media development practitioners noted the lack of collaboration and information sharing between national and international actors.

Too often the exchanges that do occur are informal and based on personal relationships.

Building coalitions supporting media (which practitioners see as vital) are not encouraged or incentivised by the modalities and priorities of media development funding.

Challenge: “Donors are often reluctant to fund processes of deliberation and dialogue and coalition building because they don't have clear metrics [...] to demonstrate success. [...] But there is a real need in the case of disinformation [...] to bring people from different sectors together. It's very siloed. One of the reasons for that is because of funding modalities. There's a need to encourage funders to support those processes of coalition building and cooperation.” (MediaDev practitioner/researcher)

Proposal: Media development groups should work with researchers/evaluators to provide a stronger case for this support to supplement future programmes.

Proposal: Donors should make coordination and information sharing a requirement for proposals and reporting for grants and programmes and take the lead in (and/or support) coordination on a national level in countries where they are working.

Emphasising “Doing no harm” over being "effective"

A donor representative explained why they had decided to emphasize the principle of “doing no harm” rather than being "effective" with regards to countering disinformation programs.

Challenge: They were not able to find an activity that was effective even after spending three years deliberating.

Solution: They changed their indicators from 'what is effective' to 'what is less harmful' as this is more tangible and measurable. Their grants now focus on supporting data journalism, fact-checking and content curation.

The 'do no harm' principle is important in terms of strategic guidance for countering disinformation as it is an essential part of the discussion around how journalism can build trust with audiences.

Reframing the discussion on disinformation to focus resources on support for journalism

Some participants made the case that focusing on disinformation can move priorities away from considering the wider information ecosystem and how quality journalism can be “scaled up” and “what can be done for journalism”, especially local journalism:

Funding local journalism is another really big solution. So that people actually have journalism in their midsts, that actually responds to their needs that they understand and see the quality of journalism that can take place in that kind of environment. (Researcher)

How to make the case for journalism support

Media development actors and researchers were encouraged to use the connection/correlation between high levels of media capture, low levels of quality journalism and the increased impact of misinformation as a justification and argue for supporting independent public service media as an effective response to disinformation.

The emphasis (of media development) is often on the supply side, but doesn’t look at the problems in the broader enabling environments for high-quality independent journalism - the legal and policy environments, the incentives systems that drive disinformation, media consolidation and media capture. (Academic)

For more on this see "" in "."

Disinformation
literature reviews
evaluation
case studies section of the literature review
2. Responses aimed at producers and distributors
Logo2. Responses aimed at producers and distributorsGFMD IMPACT
Support to journalism
data