The crisis in independent media now jeopardizes progress in virtually every aspect of human development. A well-functioning independent media system is critical to sustainable social and economic development – a bulwark of peaceful, economically prosperous societies. But the alarmingly fast-growing crisis in the independent media sector made international donors and funders, key implementing agencies, and local civil society organisations ask a question:
At the Summit for Democracy hosted by the Biden administration on 9 and 10 December, the United States and others committed to increasing support for at-risk new outlets, protecting media freedom and freedom of expression as pre-conditions for democracy and human rights. But what are the key principles that need to be in place to guide donors and funders in their implementation of these, and existing commitments, to protecting freedom of media and supporting independent journalism?
Looking for the answers to this question, the Global Forum for Media Development (GFMD) and the Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA) co-hosted a through a process for updating and codifying guiding principles.
Recommendations to the Summit for Democracy
The three recommendations from the GFMD/CIMA webinar on media development were:
The international community should seek to integrate support for independent media into international cooperation for development and good governance, recognizing that Agenda 2030 and democratic progress will depend upon a concerted and collaborative response to the fundamental and structural crisis affecting the media sector.
The international community must commit to supporting a vision for media development that upholds core principles of aid effectiveness. This means supporting media development processes that are locally owned, locally driven, and produce long-term and sustainable changes in the political environment for the media.
Nick Benequista, Senior Director at CIMA, explained that the statement of principles are:
Important now, as political will surges, to ensure that we are engaging in a way to ensure that political will translates into effective meaningful action on the ground
A method of distilling the received knowledge and a tool for promoting greater assistance to the field and for structuring that assistance.
An opportunity to get the political will that we need for greater support for the media sector.
A method of organising and developing a coherent agenda among civil society organisations, as well as local, regional, and international actors.
Building on the momentum from the adoption of the Windhoek +30 declaration
The original Windhoek declaration laid the foundations for some major achievements in improving the enabling environment for free, independent and pluralistic media. However, as we plan on how to maximise the potential around realising the declaration commitment from member states to recognise and support journalism as a public good, we need to learn from missed opportunities.
“For many years, the media development community was completely disconnected from the internet governance community, and vice versa. And we are paying the bill for this mistake because we haven’t integrated the challenges of the internet correctly in the discussion of media development.” – Guilherme Canela De Souza Godoi, Chief of Freedom of Expression and Safety of Journalists Section at UNESCO.
Justin Williams, Governance Adviser, Freedom of Expression and Media Development at Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office told the webinar that:
“Although donors’ performance in terms of implementing some of these principles are sometimes being perhaps a little bit mixed, I think where they really do help is to sort of shape the debate around these things” and achieve consensus between media organisations, media development organisations, and donors on what effective support looks like.
In the run-up to the Media Freedom Conference in Estonia GFMD and CIMA will host a series of consultations with donors, implementers, and national/regional media development organisations to develop a set of general principles. GFMD and CIMA will host a meeting at the conference to discuss the principles and to encourage states to consider making an official request for the OECD DAC’s Secretariat to pursue principles and recommendations for the media sector.
As well as aiming to have these principles recognised and adopted by the OECD, considering the obstacles to effective media development are often political as well as financial, states from the Global South should be engaged in this initiative at an early stage via the UNESCO’s IPDC, the Special rapporteur of Freedom of Expression, Development Banks, and regional bodies.
In brief – What could these principles include?
Four representatives from regional and national media development actors shared their ideas on what principles for effective media development are most important to them.
Ayman Mhanna, Executive Director of Skeyes:
Needs-based, demand-driven, beneficiary-led, consultative approaches to program and project design that is rooted in local challenges and capacities and has local ownership.
Align media development support with broader international engagement.
Marija Ristic, Regional Director of the Balkan Investigative Journalism Network (BIRN):
Focus on the causes and obstacles of effective media development (especially when it comes to issues around media markets, business models and sustainability), not just the consequences.
Set goals that are contextualised and realistic based on the length of the project.
Flexibility within grants and funding is essential to allow media development actors to adapt to rapidly changing media environments.
“We should be looking at support that is long term, support that is flexible, support that is equitable – and by equitable I’m talking about North-South divide -, support that is demand-driven, and beneficiary-lead.”
Funding aimed at achieving good governance or other development aims should not instrumentalise and undermine the independence of journalism. Independent media should be seen as a pillar of democracy and accountability in its own right.
There is not sufficient emphasis on media freedom, freedom of expression, and how that is articulated and measured within existing good governance indicators.
Better data sharing among media development practitioners and donors.
Acknowledgement that the media is a sector with its own legitimate development needs that are central to the enjoyment and strengthening of democracy.