Page cover image

Meeting report

Using the OECD Principles as a catalyst for change: Insights and recommendations from the GFMD regional meeting for the wider European region

The GFMD regional meeting for the wider European region took place on May 24, 2024, in Sarajevo during the IPI World Congress and Media Innovation Festival. The meeting was organised by the GFMD and UNESCO, in partnership with the International Press Institute (IPI), the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), and the Balkan Investigative Reporting Network (BIRN).

The GFMD regional meeting aimed to provide a unique space for members and partners based and working in the wider European region to foster dialogue and collaborate on critical issues facing the present media landscape. Through collaborative discussions and knowledge sharing, participants explored best practices and innovative solutions to support a thriving and independent media in the region. The meeting also reinvigorated support for independent media and the information environment across the wider European region by uniting journalists and media support actors with donors and policymakers in brainstorming strategies for implementing the recently adopted OECD Development Cooperation Principles for Relevant and Effective Support to Media and the Information Environment.

Zoe Titus, Director of Namibia Media Trust and Chair of GFMD, Saorla McCabe, Director of Communication and Information Strategy and Policy at UNESCO and Deputy First Secretary of the UNESCO IPDC, and Sara Lindegren, Deputy Head of Mission-Counsellor at the Embassy of Sweden in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, opened the meeting by highlighting how important media support is today, and how new initiatives are paving the way for more effective engagement by donors and funders.

“We are meeting today amidst a period of great peril and uncertainty about the future of journalism and the media support sector. All of us in our different ways are navigating our organisations through a myriad of economic, political and cultural challenges. But there ARE opportunities. Opportunities that we can grasp if we are able to work together and show genuine solidarity with each other,” said Zoe Titus.

Using the OECD Principles as a catalyst for change

From left to right: Maida Muminovic (Mediacentar Sarajevo), Davor Glavas (Internews), Mark Nelson (Former Senior Director CIMA), and Mira Milosevic (GFMD)

A panel moderated by GFMD's Executive Director Mira Milosevic initiated a discussion of the OECD's Development Cooperation Principles on Relevant and Effective Support to Media and the Information Environment as a catalyst for change.

The OECD Principles are the culmination of over two years of advocacy led by GFMD and CIMA in cooperation with the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) secretariat and representatives from the United Kingdom, Sweden, Switzerland, the United States, France, and others. For more information please visit this dedicated page in the GFMD IMPACT resource centre.

The IPI Congress was organised in the hotel Holiday that has a symbolic significance and was the base for journalists during the 1992-1995 Sarajevo siege, and one of the Congress sessions was dedicated to reflecting on the siege of Sarajevo. GFMD’s regional event panel also looked back on the experiences and lessons learned and how assistance changed over the years.

Mediacentar Sarajevo was established in April 1995 during the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina to address the gap in journalism as media outlets multiplied but lacked sufficient journalists.

Reflecting on the do no harm principle and lessons on what did not work, Maida Muminovic, its Executive Director, noted:

Careful attention to local context and being cautious with ideas to transpose effective solutions from something that works somewhere will not necessarily work in the countries where assistance is being given. We have a number of examples in terms of the laws that don't work, that are superb in the paper, but simply not adapted enough to the local context or the work of institutions. So, mere application and copying of solutions do not frequently work”.

In terms of what worked well, Maida emphasised the importance of investing in the education and capacitation of journalists and newsrooms, citing the BBC School of Journalism at Mediacentar Sarajevo as a successful example. Over nearly 30 years, this investment has proven crucial for fostering professionalism and good practices in journalism in the country.

Davor Glavas, Chief of Party of the USAID-funded Balkan Media Assistance Program (BMAP)-Forward and Internews Advisor for the Western Balkans, recounted his earlier involvement in preparing an analysis of ten years of donor support (1995-2005) for media projects in Croatia. This report, conducted when donor funds were drying up, examined 47 media projects that had received substantial international support. Surprisingly, only three of these projects survived two years after the donor community withdrew from Croatia. The common factors among the successful projects were that they existed before international donor involvement and enjoyed stable, long-term financial support from a consistent pool of donors, rather than relying on ad hoc funding.

Mark Nelson, former Senior Director at CIMA, highlighted the earlier challenging conversations within the OECD DAC regarding the inclusion of media in development discussions, eventually leading to a shift in perspective among donors. A report by the World Bank in 2012, for example, revealed disorganised and duplicated efforts in media development, prompting a push for collective donor responsibility and increased funding. In response to the question from the audience on scepticism regarding actual donor unity and engagement, he referred to the Principles and stated:

“This document is more of a process that we are outlining here that pushes the donors to live up to these kinds of commitments, and I realised that they have made many commitments that they did not keep. So it will be up to us to push for those commitments and to try to hold them accountable according to the things that they agreed in this document. But it's coming from a very long road of lacking coordination and coherence”.

Mira Milosevic highlighted the historical context of development assistance, noting its original focus on poverty alleviation and humanitarian aid rather than media support. She emphasised the structural limitations of development assistance in catering to the needs of the media sector, in spite of its evolving importance. Despite systemic constraints, the panellists underscored the significance of development assistance in funding impactful journalism, particularly investigative and cross-border reporting. Additionally, they discussed the broader applicability of media development principles to other sectors like anti-corruption and health, presenting new avenues for engagement with international financial institutions.

Lessons learned from media assistance in the Western Balkans:

  • Local Ownership: Assistance must be rooted in local knowledge and expertise. International experts should trust and work with local professionals to ensure support and success.

  • Engagement with Local Political Actors: Consider existing political power relations to prevent local powers from seizing control of media post-assistance.

  • Donor Coordination: Early international assistance was ad hoc and uncoordinated. Different donors had varying focuses, leading to perceived competition and gaps.

  • Consistency and Long-term Commitment: Projects need time to evaluate success; abrupt changes can lead to failure.

  • Adaptation to Local Context: Effective solutions from one area may not work elsewhere. Laws and institutional solutions must be adapted to the local context.

  • Importance of Thriving Economy: Media relies on a strong economy and market for advertising revenue. Diverse financing models are crucial, but a flourishing economy remains important for media sustainability.

Reflections on the OECD Principles: identified challenges and recommendations

Breakout groups discuss practical ways that the principles could be implemented

Structure of the summary

To examine the OECD Principles in depth we invited six members and partners to share their experiences of both effective and ineffective practices, highlighting the benefits of aligning with the OECD Principles and the drawbacks of misalignment. Afterwards, participants were divided into five breakout groups to discuss themes identified as crucial for the media in the region under the framework of the OECD principles – how would main regional challenges improve if the principles were implemented and what would be the best modality to leverage the principles to adopt better practices of media assistance. For the purpose of this report, we summarised and grouped main points, identified challenges and recommendations from both presentations and group discussions and presented them under each of the OECD principles


Principle 1: Ensure that assistance does not harm public interest media

Principle 1: Ensure that assistance does not harm public interest media.

When discussing Principle 1, Maida Muminovic noted: “What I didn't see enough highlighted in this do-no-harm principle in relevance with the media systems is the importance of the economy as such. Media is part of the market that has to flourish so that companies and individuals have funds to spend on advertising. However, with diverse financing models in the media of today, this is still quite important. So, out of all processes that have to happen in parallel with media development, I would emphasise the importance of a thriving economy, a thriving market that can sustain business development”.

Davor Glavas also highlighted: “There are two principles that we should take into consideration when thinking about safeguarding Principle 1, doing no harm to independent media. And these principles are number one - localisation strategy and localisation approach, meaning giving the local actors the lead in all the processes that we are doing. Providing them tailor-made expertise, and tailor-made support, not one size fits all. Number two, not in order of importance - donor ”.

Identified challenges to implementation

Recommendations

Principle 2: Increase financial and other forms of support

Principle 2: Increase financial and other forms of support to public interest media and the information environment, in order to strengthen democratic resilience.

Evgenia Konovalova, Program Manager for Amplify Europe at the Media Development Investment Fund (MDIF), described MDIF's mission to support independent media globally without interfering with editorial policies. Launched in 2022 with funding from the Dutch and German postcode lotteries, Amplify Europe focuses on enhancing the business sustainability of small and medium-sized independent digital media companies in Europe. Through needs assessments, mentoring, and innovation grants, Amplify Europe helps media companies improve their financial models, grow revenues, and diversify income streams. Konovalova highlighted successes in Romania, Bulgaria, and Croatia, where participants saw significant growth in advertising and subscription revenue. She also mentioned Pluralis, MDIF's new fund for investing in successful European media companies to preserve editorial independence. Participants were particularly interested in the lottery funding.

Katerina Sinadinovska, editor of "Agenda 35" and co-founder of the Balkan Center For Constructive Policies in North Macedonia, discussed the distortion of the Macedonian media market during Nikola Gruevski's populist right-wing government, which funnelled millions of public funds into private media, creating an uneven playing field. Despite efforts by the Macedonian media community, this practice continued under subsequent administrations. Sinadinovska and her colleagues have proposed a media pluralism fund to support real media content like investigative journalism and educational programs, instead of directly funding media owners. She emphasised the crucial support from international donors, particularly for media associations, but stressed the need for quality media programs to counter disinformation and poor journalistic practices. She cautioned against relying on government support, which threatens media independence, and called for more direct assistance in developing strong media content.

Identified challenges to implementation

Recommendations

Principle 3: Take a whole of system perspective

Principle 3: Consider the media and information environment as a development sector in itself, a critical part of efforts to promote and protect democracy, human rights, gender equality and development as well as a sector which can support the implementation of other development goals.

Jodi Blankenship, Project Manager for Reporters Shield, highlighted the growing threat of strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) targeting journalists. These lawsuits are designed to intimidate, financially drain, and silence journalists, leading to self-censorship and the avoidance of certain stories. Blankenship cited the case of Daphne Caruana Galizia, who faced numerous libel suits at the time of her assassination for her investigative work. She emphasised the importance of a whole-system perspective (Principle 3) to support the media environment, noting that Reporters Shield, in collaboration with various legal networks and supported by USAID, provides legal defence for investigative journalists worldwide. Unlike traditional media insurance, which is costly and limited, Reporters Shield operates as a nonprofit, offering a scalable mutual defence model that prioritises member benefits. This approach aims to reduce self-censorship and stress for journalists, increasing the number of public interest stories published.

A whole system perspective in any domain, including legal and technological frameworks, emphasises an integrated approach that considers all components and their interactions within the entire system. This approach not only necessitates robust legal protections to ensure ethical and fair practices but also leverages the latest technological innovations to optimise efficiency and effectiveness. In the break-out group discussion, the conversation predominantly centred around the technological challenges that hinder the adoption of a whole system perspective.

Identified challenges to implementation

Recommendations

Principle 4: Strengthen local leadership and ownership

Principle 4: Strengthen local leadership and ownership, empowering media partners as well as other actors in the information environment such as civil society organisations and online content creators to meaningfully participate in policies and programmes.

Milka Domanovic, Regional Director of the Balkan Investigative Reporting Network (BIRN), emphasised the importance of localisation and strengthening local leadership in media assistance. She commended the efforts of GFMD and CIMA in facilitating these discussions and highlighted the need for the meaningful participation of local actors, ensuring media assistance is context-appropriate, and based on local demands and evidence. Domanovic stressed the necessity of long-term sustainable core support for media initiatives. Despite local familiarity and support, she noted that donor coordination needs improvement, particularly in conducting comprehensive needs assessments before project inception to align with local capacities and conditions. She concluded by advocating for trust in local expertise, better donor coordination, and flexibility throughout project planning and implementation phases.

Identified challenges to implementation

Recommendations

Principle 5: Improve coordination of support

Principle 5: Improve coordination of support to the media and information environment, both among donor agencies and between development and diplomatic efforts to support media freedom, especially in contexts of crisis.

Olga Myrovych, CEO of the Lviv Media Forum, emphasised the critical need for donor coordination, especially during crises like the war in Ukraine. She highlighted the success of the GFMD’s information-sharing efforts, which facilitated timely and effective media support in Ukraine, such as providing charging stations after infrastructure damage. However, Olga noted a reluctance among many donor organisations to share funding practices, which hampers broader coordination. The speaker advocated for more inclusive and comprehensive donor coordination, involving more stakeholders and addressing broader issues beyond avoiding program duplication. She called for transparent approaches, government involvement, and a focus on building a professional and influential media environment through cooperation and healthy competition.

Identified challenges to implementation

Recommendations

Principle 6: Invest in knowledge, research, and learning

Principle 6: Invest in knowledge, research, and learning

Jasna Kilalic, Deputy Democracy Officer, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina, discussed the challenges faced by independent media, emphasising the threat to free speech posed by authoritarian leaders. She highlighted two USAID-funded programs: a bilateral media engagement activity in Bosnia and Herzegovina and a regional initiative covering five Western Balkan countries. These programs aim to enhance media outlets' operational capabilities, improve quality and reach, and foster collaboration and networking. Kilalic underscored the importance of knowledge, research, and learning in media development, citing examples of how these initiatives have helped media partners increase audience and revenue. She also mentioned the Balkan Media Assistance Program, which supports media competitiveness and resilience in the Western Balkans, including efforts to prevent media capture and promote innovative business models. Kilalic concluded by inviting continued support and engagement in the region from USAID and other partners.

Identified challenges to implementation

Recommendations

For more resources, case studies and mapping documents relevant to the meeting, please visit this dedicated page below:

Literature review

Last updated

Was this helpful?